Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — Chathamization

Chathamization

HN member
Joined
Fri, Jan 02, 2015, 3:15 PM UTC
HN karma
2,527
Public activity
610 items

About Chathamization

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #43979826

    Right, most people are would hate eating a 100% pure cacao bar, but that doesn't mean they won't enjoy chocolate. There's so much variability in these things, and in the end, it mo…

  2. comment
    Comment #43469425

    > at least without assistive/adapted systems such as a wheelchair and accessible bus. Which is precisely what the robotic body I mentioned would be. You're talking about humans who…

  3. comment
    Comment #43468411

    How are any of these a useful path to asking an AI to cook dinner? We already know many tasks that most humans can do relatively easily, yet most people don’t expect AI to be able …

  4. comment
    Comment #43468338

    That’s precisely what I meant in my comment by “these types of tests.” People are eventually going to have some sort of standard for what they consider AGI. But that doesn’t mean t…

  5. comment
    Comment #43468268

    > Our belief is that once we can no longer come up with quantifiable problems that are "feasible for humans and hard for AI" then we effectively have AGI. I don’t think that follow…

  6. comment
    Comment #43281764

    One of the things is wanting to be part of the discourse. For instance, this has happened to me several times - big players are talking about a particular topic. I dig through the …

  7. comment
    Comment #43278944

    > Of course, I’m self-aware enough to recognize that it might be because my writing is terrible or because I’m covering topics no one cares about. I've hard similar issues with you…

  8. comment
    Comment #41978682

    No, I'm genuinely confused by your claim that in order for Chinese to be similar to English in this manner, it would be "somehow unique among all human languages." These are contra…

  9. comment
    Comment #41972925

    That's very much the impression I get. I've never seen pinyin used in Chinese writing, and the Chinese friends I've met have said they've never seen it either (they said they'd pro…

  10. comment
    Comment #41971920

    Removing the added information would make it much more difficult to parse, though. Paragraphs don't exist in oral English - or spaces between words, quotation marks, capitalization…

  11. comment
  12. comment
    Comment #41971738

    > So you were talking about both English and Chinese in that sentence. I was talking about English in the sentence you quoted. In the next paragraph, I said that Chinese was the sa…

  13. comment
    Comment #41969154

    Being able to write a character by hand, being able to type it up, and being able to read it are all different things. I doubt many Chinese would be thrown off from reading or typi…

  14. comment
    Comment #41968473

    > Unless Chinese is somehow unique among all human languages, this isn't true. I was talking about English in that paragraph: > The same is true for written English - putting space…

  15. comment
    Comment #41967940

    From what I've heard people say (and what I've seen), the most common way to handle it is to simply write another character that sounds the same. In other words, the characters can…

  16. comment
    Comment #41967468

    The shrimp example is kind of strange. Like you said, it's an extremely common character, and not a difficult one either. But beyond that, if you look at it he got the radical, 虫, …

  17. comment
    Comment #41967118

    It would result in a pretty severe loss of fidelity. You may think it’s not needed, because that information isn’t available in spoken Chinese. The same is true for written English…

  18. comment
    Comment #41967041

    Even less of a difference. There's no equivalent character, so it's clearly 烹 written with an extra stroke. It's more like the difference between writing "deceive" and decieve."

  19. comment
    Comment #41966998

    > I guess you could write down 景茶 (jing3cha2) and rely on the phonetics, or use a different word if you know one, but it's still wrong on a level that "choclit" just isn't. If a no…

  20. comment
    Comment #41966958

    The fact that 嚔/sneeze is usually the go to example means it ends up becoming the exception that proves the rule. Most other characters are much more easily remembered.

  21. comment
    Comment #41905950

    True. You also need a group that knows what they're doing and is trying to be cutthroat. Then the whole table is trying to trade for color sets and dissuade others from trading for…

  22. comment
    Comment #41901691

    Right, but I don't see anything in the quoted text implying that's not the case: > In Sirens of Titan, there’s this army of Mars which is really a joke. No one in the army, [not] e…

  23. comment
    Comment #41900621

    Which part of that quote do you think is a misreading? That's exactly how I remember it unfolding in the book.

  24. comment
    Comment #41900604

    It depends on the people you’re playing with. With an active group there’s a lot of strategy that goes into the negotiations, and also a good amount of “push your luck” gameplay. I…

  25. comment
    Comment #41844774

    > I still remember the screen names of folks I interacted with in and on IRC, AIM, ezboard, IGN boards, forums, etc. > I only remember a handful of HN usernames and absolutely zero…