Viewing profile — CerryuDu
CerryuDu
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Nov 27, 2025, 10:42 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 76
- Public activity
- 34 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About CerryuDu
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #46397556
> The objections to non-profits, OSFs, education, healthcare, and small companies all boil down to: they don't pay enough or they're inconvenient. Those are valid personal reasons,…
-
comment
Comment #46397328
> you need some insane mental gymnastics Perhaps. I dislike google (have disliked it for many years with varying intensity), but they have done stuff where I've been compelled to s…
-
comment
Comment #46396387
> didn't spare a thought for Google's other (in their opinion, bigger) misgivings, for well over a decade That's the main disagreement, I believe. I'm definitely not an indiscrimin…
-
comment
Comment #46396344
> non-profits I think those are pretty problematic. They can't pay well (no profits...), and/or they may be politically motivated such that working for them would mean a worse comp…
-
comment
Comment #46396212
> We all are slaves to capitalism Yes, but informedly choosing your slavedriver still has merit. > Extrem fast and massive automatisation around the globe might be the only think p…
-
comment
Comment #46396175
For those of us who consider programming a way to self-realize, the potential vanishing of programming as a lucrative job definitely seems threatening. However, I don't think it co…
-
comment
Comment #46396061
> You either surf this wave or get drowned by it I don't think so. Handcrafted everything and organic everything continue to exist; there is demand for them. "Being relegated to a …
-
comment
Comment #46395984
> I still glue everything else together myself. This is the core difference. Just "gluing things together" satisfies you. It's unacceptable to me. You don't want to own your code a…
-
comment
Comment #46395953
> Not all of AI is consumer LLM chatbots And as long as that used to be the case, not many people revolted.
-
comment
Comment #46395939
I've tested the "emerging new thing", and it's utter trash.
-
comment
Comment #46395895
yeah, me too: > while maintaining perfect awareness "awareness" my ass. Awful.
-
comment
Comment #46395872
> Criticizing anthropomorphic language is lazy, unconsidered, and juvenile. To the contrary, it's one of the most important criticisms against AI (and its masters). The same critic…
-
comment
Comment #46395733
> AI makes people feel icky Yes! > it’s important for us to understand why we actually like or dislike something Yes! The primary reason we hate AI with a passion is that the compa…
-
comment
Comment #46395631
... not to mention that most of the time, what AI produces is unmitigated slop and factual mistakes , deliberately coated in dopamine-infusing brown-nosing. I refuse for my positio…
-
comment
Comment #46395544
Others in the thread seem to be saying that he has retired (sort of) a few years ago.
-
comment
Comment #46395531
Can you elaborate on the "all parts of an experience are valid" part? I may be missing something. Thanks.
-
comment
Comment #46395501
> We’ve been compromising on those morals for our whole career Yes! > The needle moved just a little bit That's where we disagree.
-
comment
Comment #46395450
Don't be ridiculous. Google has been doing many things, some of those even nearly good. The super talented/prolific/capable have always gravitated to powerful maecenases. (This app…
-
comment
Comment #46393596
... not to mention the time it takes to load directory entries and inodes when the cache is cold.
-
comment
Comment #46387468
motif apps? xmag? xfontsel? forwarding over ssh? ~/.XCompose? "links2 -g"?
-
comment
Comment #46346802
Vector Clocks! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamport_timestamp
-
comment
Comment #46296097
I find the repeated "yolo" qualifications very tiresome, yawn-inducing. At least in this article: https://fil-c.org/runtime the term "classic C" is still used. I don't expect for a…
-
comment
Comment #46256917
Thanks!
-
comment
Comment #46250803
Thanks for the answer. I disagree because I've seen closures shine (in OCaml) and suck terribly (in C++). Same concept, extremely different programming experience and debuggability…
-
comment
Comment #46250616
return in_reverse? (right > left) - (right right) - (left I prefer (with "greater" being ±1, defaulting to +1): return left right ? greater : 0;