Viewing profile — Caylio

K

No, some were better.

Nobody said that skill was sufficient to win, I am simply pointing out the obvious fact that it's still required (in response to nkrisc who claimed that no skill was required at al…

Your "big" difference is useless and changes nothing to the topic at hand. Nkrisc claimed that no skill was required at all, only luck, which is clearly false. I was just pointing …

Every winner will have made a skillful shot, hence a skillful shot is required to win. It's a combination of both therefore you obviously can't claim no skill is required at all. N…

The machine can only "decide to let you win" if you have the skill to get close, otherwise no chance.

"extensive"

If you don't link to the thread, everyone will prefer to disregard what you say.

Yes, treated like people that can be replaced by robots.

He is proving his point by contradicting himself, a true mathematician.

This one: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25557631

Its the DK effect in action.

You just fed one

But by his definition, this would be an evil thing to do.

Then you are not Catholic

Having equality signs at each step does not mean you can reverse the steps. You need bidirectional implication for that.

Mathematical problem solving by Alan Shoenfield

The same could be said about your comment.

Grammar nazi.

You sound bitter.

That's a consequence of the axiom of choice, which has historically been a highly controversial axiom.