Viewing profile — CBMPET2001

Eh, with something this horrendously egregious I think their customers have a right to know how carelessly their data was handled, regardless of the remediation steps taken after d…

I've seen that exact pattern used to safely unwrap a weakly captured 'self' within a closure (to avoid retain cycles)

Ah, so the 'signed checksum' field isn't actually the checksum of the signed document? How odd . . . but yeah, now that I think about it, they couldn't know the hash of a document …

I think they're referring to the 'signed checksum' field on the document, and this line from the article > Interestingly, the certificate page was identical in both documents, incl…

OP mentions in the article that the draft was uploaded on 9/22/25, so it can't have been a simple mix up where the version with the addendum was the one they had originally intende…

Per the post, the takedowns are due to false positive malware flags, not because of copyright takedowns. So I guess the unmodified, 100% genuine ROMs don't trip the malware detecti…

True, but Apple and Google were never any impediment to that beyond just skimming some off the top.

I'm not sure how Spanish criminal law works, but even if it does work like in the US, the press release doesn't actually mention any seized funds or property at all

If that were the case then they wouldn't have shut down the scheme and arrested the perpetrators

Sixth (and this one is pretty indisputable): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LAM_Mozambique_Airlines_Flight...

Not sure that such a heavily edited two-minute clip is fully representative of the over hour and a half-long meeting (which also includes a presentation detailing the years worth o…