Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — ByteJockey

ByteJockey

HN member
Joined
Sun, May 10, 2020, 5:06 PM UTC
HN karma
707
Public activity
466 items

About ByteJockey

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #32118399

    It's slightly more complicated in practice. The US has this weird system where you can opt out of full union membership and become what's called an "objector". You opt out of union…

  2. comment
    Comment #32118119

    I appreciate the link, thank you.

  3. comment
    Comment #32117993

    Given the context of this thread (comparison of ruby and python), it should be noted that python also has this. You can decorate a method with `@property` and call the method witho…

  4. comment
    Comment #32117955

    > but I feel like it makes it very difficult to reason about performance This seems like a form of premature optimization. I mean, you're not wrong technically, but if you were exc…

  5. comment
    Comment #32117834

    They mention doing this a decade ago. They were probably using utilities to manage downloads from the ruby application archive (which would have still been around at the time) and …

  6. comment
    Comment #32068753

    > Sure the water in that creek might be falling hundreds of meters, or even kilometers, but without a dam the height differential at your generator is only going to he a few metres…

  7. comment
    Comment #32064863

    That really depends on what percentage of water's potential energy is expended in small creeks and the like vs big rivers. I actually have no idea how to estimate that. Anyone have…

  8. comment
    Comment #32064746

    Wait... so the US army did poorly against guerilla combatants half way across the world, and therefore another country that lost in Afghanastan and a country that hasn't successful…

  9. comment
    Comment #32064687

    > Yes, I mostly see people saying that laws don't matter because billionaires are beyond law at this point. Huh. Weird. Well, I don't see it brought up on HN all that often (once a…

  10. comment
    Comment #32064594

    > They plan to use the exact same code! Did they announce a change of plans? Their website just says that they have no plans for a borrow checker (i.e. it's not required to actuall…

  11. comment
    Comment #32041322

    Wait, is that what you always see as the argument against it? Whenever I've seen it brought up it's always that it would require a constitutional amendment (specifically in the US)…

  12. comment
    Comment #32022026

    > It completely failed and SUV consumption skyrocketed and people stopped buying minivans and station wagons. The government put fuel efficiency regulations on sedans in the 1970s.…

  13. comment
    Comment #31886885

    > When people air opinions they're unwilling to change That's the thing, there are a lot more positions these days that people seem to be unwilling to change.

  14. comment
    Comment #31886618

    If that were the case, you'd expect to see forking of 3rd party libraries rather than writing of new ones.

  15. comment
    Comment #31834623

    That may very well be. What's the windows support like/does it come with windows pre-installed? I may personally hate windows with a passion, but if we're talking about the layman'…

  16. comment
    Comment #31818942

    I think ARM would be allowed, but for a layman to consider it a PC, you probably do need the windows capabilities.

  17. comment
    Comment #31804565

    > That political party's actions are about weakening the federal government so as to make it easier for large corporations to behave abusively, not because of trust. Can you think …

  18. comment
    Comment #31802979

    > I don't think Americans and American companies understand how little trust rest of us have for the American government. Have you... have you seen our politics? What makes you thi…

  19. comment
    Comment #31796081

    > Water, air, chicken, dirt, star stuff. God, the Captain Planet re-boot got weird...

  20. comment
    Comment #31737822

    For this to work, you'd need most of the code to be written by people who are paid (i.e. professionals). In my experience somewhere between 50-80% of code at most places is stuff p…

  21. comment
    Comment #31733945

    > how is that not putting code in the driver's seat? Because humans enter into them. What you're describing is not a problem of the code making decisions for people, it's a problem…

  22. comment
    Comment #31718379

    It's considered to have ended (and possibly started reversing) in developed countries starting in the mid 1990s. Your link even covers it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flynn_effec…

  23. comment
    Comment #31718051

    > but that puts implacable emotionless code in the driving seat, and the article explains very eloquently why that's a bad thing. To re-iterate my previous point, putting code in t…

  24. comment
    Comment #31714435

    > A deeply and clearly thought out argument for why immutable blockchains and code as law are terrible ideas, yet the conclusion is that crypto-anarchist technologies are a net goo…

  25. comment
    Comment #31708472

    > Which is why punitive fines ought to scale with income and/or wealth That really seems like it depends on what the damage a particular action causes. Property destruction, for ex…