Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — BudVVeezer

BudVVeezer

HN member
Joined
Sun, Feb 07, 2010, 6:18 PM UTC
HN karma
1,059
Public activity
190 items

About BudVVeezer

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. story
  2. story
  3. comment
    Comment #15777856

    The title is incorrect, it's WG23, not WG32.

  4. story
  5. comment
    Comment #15247197

    > __they don't want these things next to where they live__. Which is the precise definition of Not In My Back Yard...

  6. comment
    Comment #15191156

    It's consistent with for (init; condition;) {} and solves a problem like: if (std::vector v = f(); !v.empty()) { // Use v } without requiring an extra compound statement to limit t…

  7. comment
    Comment #14779790

    Not quite. It was submitted for PDTS (proposed draft technical standard), which means it goes out for balloting to ISO national bodies. That balloting either succeeds (at which poi…

  8. comment
    Comment #13939227

    The clang-tidy tool has some C++ Core Guideline checks under the cppcoreguidelines module.

  9. comment
    Comment #13935936

    Some of these rules are currently in clang-tidy, but the coverage is by no means comprehensive. Patches always welcome. :-)

  10. comment
    Comment #13935398

    What's considered critical or difficult to discover is a bit subjective, but: It's easy to forget that alignment is important on some architectures (other than for performance reas…

  11. story
  12. comment
    Comment #13854100

    Yes and no. Many compilers support #pragma once, but whether your build environment handles it is another matter. Having your headers on network drives, or having symlinks to your …

  13. comment
    Comment #13464686

    Is it the /d1reportSingleClassLayoutXXX flag, described here? https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/vcblog/2007/05/17/diagnosin...

  14. story
  15. story
  16. story
  17. comment
    Comment #11375032

    You are forgetting attributes, which can be empty and are grammatical sequences (so you can add them infinitely). [[]][[]][]()[[]][[]]{}();

  18. story
  19. story
  20. comment
    Comment #10822806

    Ah, that's right, ranges was a new work item planned for TS (but still not planned for IS in C++17).

  21. comment
    Comment #10818373

    The author may be a bit confused as to what C++17 will be. Modules will be in a TS, most likely. Transactional memory, concepts, ranges, and filesystem are already in published TSe…

  22. story
  23. story
  24. story
  25. story