Viewing profile — BudVVeezer
BudVVeezer
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Feb 07, 2010, 6:18 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,059
- Public activity
- 190 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About BudVVeezer
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #15777856
The title is incorrect, it's WG23, not WG32.
- story
-
comment
Comment #15247197
> __they don't want these things next to where they live__. Which is the precise definition of Not In My Back Yard...
-
comment
Comment #15191156
It's consistent with for (init; condition;) {} and solves a problem like: if (std::vector v = f(); !v.empty()) { // Use v } without requiring an extra compound statement to limit t…
-
comment
Comment #14779790
Not quite. It was submitted for PDTS (proposed draft technical standard), which means it goes out for balloting to ISO national bodies. That balloting either succeeds (at which poi…
-
comment
Comment #13939227
The clang-tidy tool has some C++ Core Guideline checks under the cppcoreguidelines module.
-
comment
Comment #13935936
Some of these rules are currently in clang-tidy, but the coverage is by no means comprehensive. Patches always welcome. :-)
-
comment
Comment #13935398
What's considered critical or difficult to discover is a bit subjective, but: It's easy to forget that alignment is important on some architectures (other than for performance reas…
- story
-
comment
Comment #13854100
Yes and no. Many compilers support #pragma once, but whether your build environment handles it is another matter. Having your headers on network drives, or having symlinks to your …
-
comment
Comment #13464686
Is it the /d1reportSingleClassLayoutXXX flag, described here? https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/vcblog/2007/05/17/diagnosin...
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #11375032
You are forgetting attributes, which can be empty and are grammatical sequences (so you can add them infinitely). [[]][[]][]()[[]][[]]{}();
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #10822806
Ah, that's right, ranges was a new work item planned for TS (but still not planned for IS in C++17).
-
comment
Comment #10818373
The author may be a bit confused as to what C++17 will be. Modules will be in a TS, most likely. Transactional memory, concepts, ranges, and filesystem are already in published TSe…
- story
- story
- story
- story