Viewing profile — BrendanEich
BrendanEich
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jul 09, 2010, 8:42 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 4,049
- Public activity
- 1,408 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About BrendanEich
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48595374
Don't trust Wikipedia. I've used the "glue language" phrase myself, but when I did Mocha in May 1995 for Netscape 2, it was to make an HTML-embedded scripting language that could b…
-
comment
Comment #48595122
Were you? I have no idea who you are, but the only "other C-level position" was an unspecified throwaway line from Reid Hoffman, who didn't have authority to create any such "Chief…
-
comment
Comment #48595092
I was a real founder (not retconned fake founder). My contributions were almost entirely before taking the CEO job, of course. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44544226 "Lots o…
-
comment
Comment #48076394
That was when I thought the attribute was added only when the user searched, but it was added even to a FQDN which should not have been done. We didn't make anything from this bug,…
-
comment
Comment #48053096
Who "he"? I :set et (expand tabs) in vim :-P.
-
comment
Comment #47858632
https://x.com/BrendanEich/status/1981097992477364231 There's no need for a "Sorry". On the other hand, Brave dying on the wrong hill does not help anyone. This isn't a "wreck other…
-
comment
Comment #47162159
A mundane reason for why donations to the 501c3 parent Mozilla Foundation can't go to Firefox or Gecko engineers is U.S. tax law. We found out the hard way after the IRS San Jose o…
-
comment
Comment #46984765
Rewards has always been opt in, so you don't need to get past it to use Brave. We would not be here without it, but use Chrome or Firefox if you prefer. IMHO "really gross" applies…
-
comment
Comment #46953668
> ... things like "Come home, white man" and other dog-whistles on image-boards Wow, that's a new lie. Do you have any evidence? This isn't something Brave ever did, but it's easy …
-
comment
Comment #46953653
We never, as in not ever, offered crypto mining in the browser.
-
comment
Comment #46516851
The grants came from our token fund, not users' tokens (no way to buy BAT then). The issue which I found out about late, and fixed right away, was infringing on right to publicity,…
-
comment
Comment #46516794
That blog post is about a partnership (which ended), but you probably saw some sponsored images at the time, in new tab pages (1 of 4 then, I think; the rest are just art images). …
-
comment
Comment #46437082
That's all b.s. of the ripest kind.
-
comment
Comment #46428600
No. I wrote Mocha in C. Where did you hear this CL fish story?
-
comment
Comment #46220523
I don't know what "semantic HTML enrichment" means, but there wasn't time. The alternative was VBScript and DHTML. DHTML and Netscape's DOM forked Web content based on `if (documen…
-
comment
Comment #46220447
I didn't pick LiveScript, Netscape Marketing did. The original codename Mocha was Marc Andreessen's. This is all in the HOPL IV paper and my Lex Fridman interview.
-
comment
Comment #46188595
No, == was strict in the ten day prototype. https://x.com/BrendanEich/status/1004425861410402304 https://x.com/BrendanEich/status/1922360598995534074
-
comment
Comment #46188550
One book covers the DOM and browser APIs, one does not.
-
comment
Comment #45969787
It's opt in. The UX can be disabled, and Leo as a whole can be removed via group policy. https://search.brave.com/ask?q=how+to+disable+leo+ux+in+brav...
-
comment
Comment #45650131
"Mozilla reluctantly hired" me? False, a foolish lie if you knew better, and if you didn't, why not? Search engines and even censored Wikipedia exist. I was a founder of Mozilla in…
-
comment
Comment #45650107
(There was no DOCTYPE for DHTML. The one for HTML 4.01 was not equivalent to a DOCTYPE for DHTML.)
-
comment
Comment #45650101
JS was ubiquitous when DHTML was pushed by Microsoft, because DHTML required JScript aka JS. CSS was not there in the '90s because Netscape didn't implement, and MS did its own sub…
-
comment
Comment #45409293
Does no one use search engines any longer? Or AI chatbots, the new front end to search engines? Anyway, 2014.
-
comment
Comment #44675182
If you insist on percentage points not ratios, then how do you apportion blame to me vs the CEOs before me? I was CEO for ten days. I stood up for it to avoid Mozilla going headles…
-
comment
Comment #44601207
From the statcounter links I gave: >>> (31.82-14.34)x100/31.82 54 >>> (14.34-2.37)x100/14.35 83 54% drop from peak to when I left, 83% drop after. No one said "didn't happen".