Viewing profile — BoringCode
BoringCode
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jun 29, 2016, 4:39 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 219
- Public activity
- 63 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About BoringCode
https://bradleyrosenfeld.com
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/bradleyrosenfeld; my proof: https://keybase.io/bradleyrosenfeld/sigs/-CT-LSu9GTK44fGj-PgV302-BVkZKy1fB1v6l7mulMI ]
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #15235087
Yes, there is more to life than the cult of Snowden. No reason to run around with our heads cut off just because the man gave an interview.
-
comment
Comment #15200853
WSJ will show the full article if your referer header is set to twitter.com. You can do a search on Google like so: " https://www.wsj.com/articles/uber-faces-fbi-probe-overprogra..…
-
comment
Comment #15056856
Don't bother, this poster is just trolling and moving the goal posts is one method to do so. You could bring up how spirited and competitive the World Baseball Classic was. How it …
-
comment
Comment #15056068
Baseball is played around the world. This comment is slightly insulting and pointless.
-
comment
Comment #15055955
Misleading comment. 7.08 (a) 2 specifically applies to the scenario like in this comment: > Rule 7.08(a) Comment: Any runner after reaching first base who leaves the base path head…
-
comment
Comment #14922062
I am concurring with you. The point I'm making is that it's a matter of resources and trust, not literal "open source" that matters. If I trust an organization to put the resources…
-
comment
Comment #14921697
Many open-source projects simply don't have the resources to adequately test their products or provide support. Contrast this with a large company which has the resources and the w…
-
comment
Comment #14024908
> A better strategy would be to determine which ISP serves Congress, and pay them for the data of IPs originating from Congress. Except that would be illegal (and no ISP is going t…
-
comment
Comment #13675712
Universal 2nd Factor. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_2nd_Factor
-
comment
Comment #13639755
Not conclusively, no.
-
comment
Comment #13639509
I'm not sure speculation changes the central premise of the question. Assume that the document was up to date with the latest techniques. Would you still that consider it to be a d…
-
comment
Comment #13639298
I suspected I'd see a variation of this answer in this thread. While on some level it makes sense for some cases (the information is so benign that it doesn't matter if it is leake…
-
comment
Comment #13639146
If your analogy was true, there would be a stronger moral argument for revealing such information. But it isn't. I'm talking about this very specific case.
-
comment
Comment #13639045
Honest question: is this the type of material that should be leaked? Is there an overriding good to revealing this document to the public? I lean towards no, but I'd be interested …
-
comment
Comment #13517347
ZType is also really fun (and it runs in the browser) http://zty.pe/
-
comment
Comment #13458868
> (If you’re wondering what data the NSA collects, its own site[1] offers a list and this statement: “The standard operating procedure for the Domestic Surveillance Directorate is …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #13288718
It's not just dead, they've yet to perform untethered flight on any of their prototypes. The Terrafugia Transition is an example of a far more practical form of "flying car"
-
comment
Comment #13280476
As addressed elsewhere, the linked document is not supposed to be a proof for Russian involvement. The latter part of my comment was meant to provide some context as to why that ty…
-
comment
Comment #13280420
I'm addressing the poor thesis that "the IC has been (deliberately) wrong before, therefore they can't be trusted without an undefined amount of evidence." The points you raise are…
-
comment
Comment #13280372
I did. You're being either obtuse or are communicating your point poorly. The majority of the story is tangentially related to the statement presented in the headline. It was desig…
-
comment
Comment #13280237
Their point was that judging by the headline that should have been the end of the article. Are you trying to be obtuse?
-
comment
Comment #13280098
You clearly don't understand the intelligence process if this is your critique. First, the people making the DNC hack report are not the same as the analysts who worked on Iraq. Th…
-
comment
Comment #13242383
That's fine, you should be skeptical. But do you really expect a nation state to say "hey, this is exactly how were are damaged. Please exploit us." That's just the nature of the i…
-
comment
Comment #13242171
Due to the nature of this type of damage you likely won't hear any evidence for many years.