Viewing profile — Bluerise
Bluerise
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Oct 25, 2013, 11:26 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 153
- Public activity
- 31 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Bluerise
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #28325551
I'm running OpenBSD on it with an amdgpu WX2100 card, works nicely.
-
comment
Comment #25793882
OpenBSD obviously doesn't have NVIDIA support, but amdgpu(4) works pretty well. I'd also prefer to use AMD's own GPU, not only because I can't use NVIDIA, but also because I don't …
-
comment
Comment #25650145
First of all the feature wasn't available in the initial Big Sur release and it only got available during the Betas for the first minor patch. Second of all, some Apple developer s…
-
comment
Comment #20677626
No, it‘s a completely new implementation. The whole backend and frontend is written from the ground up.
-
comment
Comment #10900271
Which patches from Bitrig are you exactly talking about?
-
comment
Comment #10900269
Bitrig does not have support for ZFS. Must be something different from Bitrig the poster is talking about.
-
comment
Comment #10162561
The difference is that the rPi blobs actually run on the GPU, the CPU is unharmed. Still, both have access to the same memory. But that's a similar issue on the PC.
-
comment
Comment #10162547
I'm sorry, but that is wrong. The main blobs are being run on the GPU, as bootloaders, even before the actual operating system is loaded. OpenBSD does not need to run _any_ blob it…
-
comment
Comment #10162516
I did read them. Now and a few months back. Janne raises concerns about running a blob on the CPU (which does not happen), while Stuart explains the boot stages correctly in detail…
-
comment
Comment #10162347
OpenBSD does not run on the rPi because there are only a handful developers taking care of the arm subtree, and none of them have time for it or are simply not interested. Heck, th…
-
comment
Comment #10065211
http://www.square-up.org/
-
comment
Comment #9217195
That is true. OpenBSD/Theo refuses to take part in embargos, which means they don't get a heads up. Don't have a citation right now, but Theo said that publicly when Hardbleed or s…
-
comment
Comment #8854170
The funny thing is that even though they have OpenCVS in their source tree, they do not use it. It never took off and probably had too many bugs and issues. Instead they are and ha…
-
comment
Comment #8702205
For me personally, better armv7 support. Even though many things stem from our hands, NetBSD and FreeBSD are a great resource. I have already started working on SMP support, based …
-
comment
Comment #8702038
Bitrig developer here, feel free to shoot questions!
- story
-
comment
Comment #8246236
They wrote their own. A completely new implementation.
-
comment
Comment #7855022
OpenBSD did not want to be on the list of distros to be notified[0]. It's no conspiracy due to LibreSSL, but maybe rather Theo's ignorance. [0] http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=1…
- story
-
comment
Comment #7635577
Bitrig is working on support though. The devs have a few Exynos based devices, including that particular one.
-
comment
Comment #7635560
Have a look at i.MX6 based machines. Namely CuBox-i, HummingBoard, SABRE Lite and Wandboard. The Utilite is fine, too.
-
comment
Comment #7626315
They don't care about that. Their main interest is to have a library conforming to OpenBSD standards.
-
comment
Comment #7518946
> A9 core rather than the virtualization-ready A15? (I'd rather have a 64-bit ARM but those are still a ways out) There aren't really many choices. Samsung has A15 cores, but it's …
-
comment
Comment #7517809
I have been waiting for some time for the crowdfunding campaign. The FreeScale i.MX6 platform is very versatile. Up to quad core 1.2GHz, SATA, PCIe, Gigabit Ethernet (limited to 48…
- story