Viewing profile — Barathkanna
Barathkanna
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Jul 13, 2024, 1:54 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 132
- Public activity
- 85 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Barathkanna
Currently experimenting with ways to make AI deployment as seamless as web deployment. Also building Oxlo, a global platform that lets developers launch and test AI models on GPU instances (free tier for small models, like Vercel but for AI).
Background in Rust, Substrate, Linux systems, and computer vision pipelines. Focused on building practical infrastructure that scales — from decentralized edge nodes to secure on-prem inference for smart cities.
Always interested in discussing: distributed compute, model serving, real-time AI, hardware acceleration, and deep-tech company building.
Recent public activity
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #47347146
Sounds like a plan, But what if you can just pay a fixed cost every month and not worry about anything?
-
comment
Comment #47347134
That’s true, but AI is interesting because consumption-based pricing introduces a lot more variance than typical SaaS infrastructure. One user action can trigger dozens of model ca…
-
comment
Comment #47347111
Local models help remove token cost uncertainty, but they shift the problem to infrastructure and ops. GPUs, scaling, maintenance, and latency can add up quickly depending on the w…
-
comment
Comment #47347105
That’s great. Real-time tracking is a big step already. The tricky part we kept running into was the variance itself, especially with retries and agent loops. That’s partly why we …
-
comment
Comment #47347087
One underlooked source of variance is retries from formatting failures. In many agent systems the loops dominate the cost, not the raw token length. We ran into the same issue buil…
-
comment
Comment #47347073
Agreed. The real cost unit becomes the whole agent workflow, not a single LLM call. One user action can trigger dozens of calls. We ran into the same issue and ended up building ht…
-
comment
Comment #47332432
Exactly. That’s actually why we started building Oxlo.ai. Early stage builders usually just want to experiment without worrying too much about token cost spikes.
-
comment
Comment #47332377
True, but for early stage builders it’s harder to design those guardrails upfront. A lot of the time you only discover the retry patterns and cost spikes once real users start hitt…
-
comment
Comment #47332355
Local models solve the marginal cost problem, but they move the complexity into infrastructure and throughput planning instead.
-
story
Ask HN: How are people forecasting AI API costs for agent workflows?
I’ve been experimenting with agent-based features and one thing that surprised me is how hard it is to estimate API costs. A single user action can trigger anywhere from a few to d…
-
story
Show HN: Oxlo.ai – AI APIs with unlimited tokens and request based pricing
Hi HN, I’m one of the founders of Oxlo.ai. We’re building a developer first AI API platform focused on simplifying how small teams integrate AI into production. Most AI APIs charge…
-
comment
Comment #46781360
Agreed. Self-hosting gives the cleanest fixed cost, but you pay for it in ops and capacity planning. I’m mainly curious whether there’s a middle ground that gives early teams more …
-
story
Ask HN: How do you budget for token based AI APIs?
The default norm today for using AI models via APIs is token based pricing, where you pay based on how much you use. While this isn’t hard to understand, in practice it makes costs…
-
comment
Comment #46777976
I asked GPT for a rough estimate to benchmark prompt prefill on an 8,192 token input. • 16× H100: 8,192 / (20k to 80k tokens/sec) ≈ 0.10 to 0.41s • 2× Mac Studio (M3 Max): 8,192 / …
-
comment
Comment #46777911
That won’t realistically work for this model. Even with only ~32B active params, a 1T-scale MoE still needs the full expert set available for fast routing, which means hundreds of …
-
comment
Comment #46777766
A realistic setup for this would be a 16× H100 80GB with NVLink. That comfortably handles the active 32B experts plus KV cache without extreme quantization. Cost-wise we are lookin…
-
comment
Comment #46777714
TLDR: AI didn’t diagnose anything, it turned years of messy health data into clear trends. That helped the author ask better questions and have a more useful conversation with thei…
-
comment
Comment #46703029
TLDR: IPv4 is fully exhausted and no longer growing. Internet growth now depends on IPv6 adoption and address sharing, but IPv6 rollout is still uneven across regions.
-
comment
Comment #46702995
I get why this exists and appreciate the transparency, but it still feels like a slippery middle ground. Age prediction avoids hard ID checks, which is good for privacy, yet it als…
-
comment
Comment #46702976
What’s interesting here isn’t the humanoid form factor, it’s the systems integration. Plugging robots into Siemens’ industrial stack means they’re being treated like first-class no…
-
comment
Comment #46702951
TLDR: Soft deletes look easy, but they spread complexity everywhere. Actually deleting data and archiving it separately often keeps databases simpler, faster, and easier to maintai…
-
comment
Comment #46657560
Thank you!! We are definitely fully focused on Developer experience. Would love some feedback if it looks interesting
-
comment
Comment #46652831
Totally fair question, and you’re not being negative. We’re not claiming better token economics in the sense of magically cheaper tokens, and we’re not just burning money to subsid…