Viewing profile — Archit3ch
Archit3ch
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Feb 22, 2019, 7:03 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 503
- Public activity
- 364 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Archit3ch
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49184392
Same!
-
comment
Comment #49170725
It proves the point. Numpy still doesn't have the semantics of a full programming language like Mojo/C++/Julia.
-
comment
Comment #49148212
Sure, but if you're writing in the JAX DSL you've already abandoned python.
-
comment
Comment #49146141
Never had one, but I might pick one up on ebay if I ever need to support Intel Mac users.
-
comment
Comment #49145968
1. Why not Julia? IIRC, some/all of this already exists in that ecosystem. > Something to note is that quantum algorithms are never purely quantum. There is a tonne of classical pr…
-
comment
Comment #49123287
If it matches GPT-5.4 on coding tasks (as benchmarks suggest) this could be my forever model. And with partial SSD streaming, I could run it locally today. :D
-
comment
Comment #49121137
Take for instance Pandoric Macros that allow you to peek inside the hidden state of a closure: # Traditional Let over Lambda counter = let x = 100 () -> x += 1 end counter() # 101 …
-
comment
Comment #49101981
> I much prefer it to writing intrinsics in C (and the results are just as good). It's an interactive, exploratory, coding: I write small modular functions, SBCL compiles them on t…
-
comment
Comment #49101815
I'm not fluent enough in Common Lisp for that book, but the patterns in Let over Lambda translate cleanly to Julia. You can have "Let over Lambda", "Let over Lambda over Let over L…
-
comment
Comment #49101621
I wouldn't trust Gemini anywhere near my code. However, it's pretty good at regurgitating textbook answers (classic Google...). This makes it an asset for circuit design. Try one o…
-
comment
Comment #49029291
You can write Julia code as normal and see each compiled function at the REPL. Very similar to a local Compiler Explorer. Although as mentioned plenty of times, the largest wins te…
-
comment
Comment #49027272
If uglier code can turn your non-realtime app into realtime, then it's worth it.
-
comment
Comment #49027221
In some cases the ergonomics are worse than C, which is a feat in 2026. Portable SIMD is (perma?) nightly. Requires 'unsafe' everywhere. To skip bounds-checking, you typically need…
-
comment
Comment #49026950
Or it exists and is not optimal for your use case?
-
comment
Comment #48999790
> if someone would kindly quantise this down for the 64GB paupers The Q4_K_M is 75GB. I'm exactly at 64GB, and I wouldn't quantize it further. Instead, do partial weight residency …
-
comment
Comment #48999674
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #48990369
Reading "Custom CPU" I expected wafer.space, instead of FPGA.
-
comment
Comment #48986435
I assume Nativ doesn't support SSD streaming like DwarfStar.
-
comment
Comment #48986325
I expected a backrooms-style game where you are lost at an infinite airport...
-
comment
Comment #48986216
Mixed feelings. Good for the defenders, also good for the attackers. If Chinese models are distilled from Fable, does it mean that security questions will be answered at most to a …
-
comment
Comment #48972653
1. iOS doesn't allow JIT for apps distributed through the App Store. However, WASM (including JIT) is allowed. Effectively, this would allow Julia to run on i(Pad)OS. 2. Technicall…
-
comment
Comment #48971298
> 2. We will be targeting WasmGC in the near future, so we need our core runtime and compiler data structures to be compilable without the assumption of necessarily having linear m…
-
comment
Comment #48970646
I'm very interested in your use case. I looked into bit-slicing techniques, but they increase throughput at the cost of massive latency. This is not acceptable for realtime audio.
-
comment
Comment #48970534
Having too many orders is a good problem to have (unless it gets cloned). Worst case, you pay an external contractor to sort compliance/fulfillment/whatever.
-
comment
Comment #48970502
"Do things that don't scale!" is standard founder advice for a reason. The fact that no one else has put in the work means you get to sell $150 MIDI recorders... for a while. Which…