Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — Andrew_W

Andrew_W

HN member
Joined
Tue, Dec 18, 2018, 5:02 PM UTC
HN karma
64
Public activity
31 items

About Andrew_W

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #42635819

    Man, with all of the anti-user "features" of social sharing apps, your interface is a breath of fresh air! I'll be trying out the open source version this weekend so I can share li…

  2. comment
    Comment #26611402

    I also took a peak at your code and saw the manifest. This would be a pretty awesome PWA :) I hope you keep at it!

  3. comment
    Comment #26610508

    This is awesome! Good job on it :) Wish you had a mailing list signup - I don't want to forget about this! I took a one month Spanish class in Mexico a few years ago. It was amazin…

  4. comment
    Comment #26595678

    Yeah, and Spectre/Meltdown haven't helped. There are some pretty crazy security restrictions (no external scripts!) just to get ffmpeg running. I can't imagine the additional secur…

  5. comment
    Comment #26589525

    Definitely a performance hit! Probably a combination of the lack of hardware acceleration and running in a JS virtual machine. I haven't checked the exact hit, but that's mostly be…

  6. comment
    Comment #26588473

    Sorry for not responding sooner. That sounds like a great use case for us to handle! Although I think ffmpeg in the browser loses some efficiency over the command line. I think we …

  7. comment
    Comment #26588460

    Nope! It's all running client-side, so it uses a bit more bandwidth, but there's no way a serverless platform can compete with the cost :) If the tool is popular long term, we migh…

  8. comment
    Comment #26584453

    Interesting idea, like append the video to itself but reversed for a clean loop? I like this idea :)

  9. comment
    Comment #26584419

    True! When I first started building a video creation app, I was flailing around with google searches to find snippets to use. It was such a relief to spend an hour reading ffmpeg d…

  10. comment
    Comment #26583901

    Oh, no, I have nothing there, sorry! haha I'm using ffmpeg.wasm, it's basically ffmpeg compiled for the browser, and it's a simple layer where you basically treat it like the ffmpe…

  11. comment
    Comment #26583463

    Emailing you now :)

  12. comment
    Comment #26582816

    If you send me an e-mail (andrew@ ), I can dig in a bit more and let you know when I add it :)

  13. comment
    Comment #26582725

    Hey, this feedback is great! And it isn't even too difficult to add - we have live clipped playback in our main app. When it failed to load the video, did it show a convert option …

  14. comment
    Comment #26582696

    That's awesome! Do you have an example ffmpeg command you run? We're trying to keep this tool super simple for our end users, but I think we might be able to add a webm preset. If …

  15. comment
    Comment #26581673

    Seriously! We were trying to build our video editor in the same style (eg like tinypng and GIF optimizers). It's so cool to do it all in the browser! I even built a simple landing …

  16. comment
    Comment #26581356

    Yeah. My biggest question when I started building this was whether there was enough in the wasm to support the features we wanted to build. I've been really happy with the results …

  17. comment
    Comment #26581161

    Yeah, webm is already built in to ffmpeg, we just had a pretty limited focus for our initial release. Even our mp4s aren't very well-optimized right now. If you work with video a b…

  18. comment
    Comment #26581072

    Yeah, that's definitely an issue! We had to "optimize" loading it twice. The first time, I moved it from auto-loading to when the user clicks convert to save on bandwidth. The seco…

  19. comment
    Comment #26581009

    Oh that tool is neat, and they have a super slick UI! Our tool definitely isn't as slick, but I think that has its benefits too. Like our trim interface doesn't look as nice, but s…

  20. comment
    Comment #26580835

    Yeah, SharedArrayBuffers have been back and forth! - First they were disabled due to Spectre. - Chrome reenabled them. - New HTTP headers were added for cross-origin resource parti…

  21. comment
    Comment #26580787

    Sorry if you were having trouble because the website was down. We upgraded the server and it seems to be doing a little better! But also get it if you mean you're not in a good pla…

  22. comment
    Comment #26580699

    Thanks! DO made it kind of easy to upgrade the virtual machine haha.

  23. comment
    Comment #26580547

    It's up - for now :)

  24. comment
    Comment #26580508

    Uggh yes. Which is awesome, but... damn! haha Might need to delete and repost later?

  25. comment
    Comment #26580348

    * VM is upgraded - we're back :) * Hi HN, I love new web tech, and was excited to see ffmpeg ported to WebAssembly so decided to build a free tool that uses it to: - Clip/trim vide…