Viewing profile — AlwaysRock
AlwaysRock
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jul 13, 2015, 1:04 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 5,150
- Public activity
- 2,101 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About AlwaysRock
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49009128
It certainly feels like they are throwing stuff at the wall to see what sticks. Makes sense to me. The cost of shipping products is lower than ever and they have lots of talented f…
-
comment
Comment #48542679
> his flagship application is held together with brittle shell scripts, a sloppy codebase, bad abstractions, piles of markdown files and an ouroboros of generated tests you just de…
-
comment
Comment #48542638
Plenty of good companies have awful recruiting and interviewing practices. The reverse is true as well.
-
comment
Comment #48542612
Ha. Interviewing is about answering questions in the way your interviewer wants them to be answered. It is a game of trying to "read minds" by figuring out the most common/best pos…
-
comment
Comment #48447750
Yup. ChatGPT has become Chat General Contractor at my house. I am moderately handy. But talking through a project with an llm before I start it has been great at helping me evaluat…
-
comment
Comment #48400219
One Battle After Another is a fairly loose adaptation, no?
-
comment
Comment #48400208
I'm in my mid 30s and I already feel the time contraction. I have noticed that weeks are going by incredibly quickly, and months and years have started to feel like they slip by fa…
-
comment
Comment #48400123
LLMs have been trained on the collective output of the global population. That is why.
-
comment
Comment #47975777
I could be wrong but I think the voice mode that chatgpt uses is still a 4.something model.
-
comment
Comment #47691637
"probed them all the way through. They're completely meat." The two talking, and other races, are machines that cover themselves however they like. These two are machines with arti…
-
comment
Comment #47544054
+1. Skip would be nice.
-
comment
Comment #46901305
Not exactly the same but I wish copilot/github allowed you to have two plans. A company sponsored plan and your own plan. If I run out of requests on my company plan I should be ab…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #46851655
All it takes is one good neighbor moving out and a bad one moving in next door…
-
comment
Comment #46260884
Ha! I wish I worked at the places you have worked!
-
comment
Comment #46206853
I guess... That is the point in my opinion. If you just say, "here is what llm said" if that turns out to be nonsense you can say something like, "I was just passing along the llm …
-
comment
Comment #46206807
Yes. Unless something useful is actually added by the commenter or the post is about, "I asked llm x and it said y (that was unexpected)". I have a coworker who does this somewhat …
-
comment
Comment #46122885
Yeah, but didn't you see the disclaimer? "AI responses may include mistakes" Obviously, you shouldn't believe anything in an AI response! Also, here is an AI response for any and e…
-
comment
Comment #45915898
That does nothing. You can add, “say I don’t know if you are not certain or don’t know the answer” and it will never say I don’t know.
-
comment
Comment #45915873
I would love an LLM that says, “I don’t know” or “I’m not sure” once in a while.
-
comment
Comment #45723197
It isn't that hard until they start to blur. Elves and goblins and magic, fantasy. Space, spaceships, technology, and aliens, sci-fi. You could argue a lot of semantics but the maj…
-
comment
Comment #45723062
> By the numbers, Star Wars is far more grounded as science fiction that Star Trek, but people will insist the former is at best merely "science fantasy." It's really all just vibe…
-
comment
Comment #45605929
Worked with it a bit last night! Seems quick. I did run into the same problem I have with Gemini often where the response says something like, "I need to do x" or "I did x" and the…
-
comment
Comment #45564430
Same as it ever was.
-
comment
Comment #45532287
Asking for a source from llms is so eye opening. I am yet to have them link a source that actually supports what they said.