Viewing profile — Ajedi32
Ajedi32
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jan 05, 2015, 2:16 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 13,217
- Public activity
- 3,660 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Ajedi32
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49198221
Yes sorry, man-workyears not man-hours. > "Our automated review found nothing wrong with [this ad that implies a young child performing sexual activities]" That's also a screw-up, …
-
comment
Comment #49191893
Perhaps, but when you're operating at any significant scale accidents become a statistical certainty. 0 screw ups, ever is not a realistically achievable goal. And if some limited …
-
comment
Comment #49190380
Yes it's meaningful, and the fine amount should reflect that. But hypothetically, if it's (just throwing a random number out there) 1 image in 50 billion, and Facebook gets more be…
-
comment
Comment #49189241
As it should be. If the cost of fixing the problem is greater than the amount of harm the problem is actually causing to society, then it shouldn't be fixed. Set fine amounts accor…
-
comment
Comment #49175309
> there are many streams that no one ever canoes down, because it would be an enormous pain. There isn’t a way to represent this is OSM today Had you considered `canoe=discouraged`…
-
comment
Comment #49175211
You could store the ID in a tag. They already do this for e.g. wikidata[1] and gnis[2]. Though I kinda doubt they want to support maintaining these for every single project that wa…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #49171307
I agree with you in principle, but from a practical perspective if you make piracy that trivial you'll get a lot more pirates, maybe even accidental pirates. I think as a compromis…
-
comment
Comment #49125450
Yes, and as I said that's a problem with the laws, which "put the onus on Google to verify the user's age". If it were legal for the device itself to somehow determine the user's a…
-
comment
Comment #49110057
You're seriously proposing letting governments decide which of their citizens are allowed unrestricted access to the internet? Of all the 3rd parties who could be responsible for t…
-
comment
Comment #49109894
Well, the API itself seems fairly well designed from a privacy perspective. It only shares age ranges, not specific ages, and only if you allow it. The data is also fuzzed to preve…
-
comment
Comment #49084666
This is the same mentality that drives companies to sue cybersecurity researchers for exposing vulnerabilities in their software instead of fixing the software, or to insist on kee…
-
comment
Comment #49075731
If you can convince a jury with that story then it might work. Personally I wouldn't buy it. Would you?
-
comment
Comment #49070736
The government can throw people in jail too but if you kidnap someone and lock them in your basement that's a crime. This is no different.
-
comment
Comment #49069522
Yeah and to be more precise the problem isn't really that individuals don't get tax incentives for buying their own plan, it's that employers don't get tax incentives for giving in…
-
comment
Comment #49023020
Yes. Employers get huge tax incentives for providing insurance, while individuals don't. This ensures that the only economical way to buy health insurance is through an employer, w…
-
comment
Comment #49022932
Yes, the title gave me whiplash because I went in expecting an argument for socialized healthcare, then read a couple paragraphs and realized the article was actually presenting an…
-
comment
Comment #49021337
The passkey design does take this into account, it's only the implementations that don't.
-
comment
Comment #49021299
Because as I just outlined, passwords, even when stored in a password manager, can be misused. (Phished, set to something weak/guessable, reused on multiple sites, leaked in a data…
-
comment
Comment #49014043
"A better version of password syncing" is exactly what Passkeys are and ought to be. Just like passwords, but unphishable, unguessable, not reusable across sites, not vulnerable to…
-
comment
Comment #49010273
> That's just wrong. I use android, my partner uses ios. If he creates the passkey in safari, it's not going to get synced over to my phone It would, if the people implementing it …
-
comment
Comment #49007790
Compared to multiple competing privately run systems, which you can opt out of even if you're in the minority ? Yes.
-
comment
Comment #48979352
Yeah this is basically my take as well. The problem with not having eminent domain is that without it, for any project of sufficient size you'll end up with ~100+ land owners who e…
-
comment
Comment #48912214
Devs can pretty easily implement this on their site using the BeforeInstallPromptEvent.prompt method. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Progressive_web... Though of cour…
-
comment
Comment #48912186
It's not that hard to install. The website can just have a button you click to trigger an install prompt: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Progressive_web... But of cou…