Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — Ajedi32

Ajedi32

HN member
Joined
Mon, Jan 05, 2015, 2:16 PM UTC
HN karma
13,217
Public activity
3,660 items

About Ajedi32

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49198221

    Yes sorry, man-workyears not man-hours. > "Our automated review found nothing wrong with [this ad that implies a young child performing sexual activities]" That's also a screw-up, …

  2. comment
    Comment #49191893

    Perhaps, but when you're operating at any significant scale accidents become a statistical certainty. 0 screw ups, ever is not a realistically achievable goal. And if some limited …

  3. comment
    Comment #49190380

    Yes it's meaningful, and the fine amount should reflect that. But hypothetically, if it's (just throwing a random number out there) 1 image in 50 billion, and Facebook gets more be…

  4. comment
    Comment #49189241

    As it should be. If the cost of fixing the problem is greater than the amount of harm the problem is actually causing to society, then it shouldn't be fixed. Set fine amounts accor…

  5. comment
    Comment #49175309

    > there are many streams that no one ever canoes down, because it would be an enormous pain. There isn’t a way to represent this is OSM today Had you considered `canoe=discouraged`…

  6. comment
    Comment #49175211

    You could store the ID in a tag. They already do this for e.g. wikidata[1] and gnis[2]. Though I kinda doubt they want to support maintaining these for every single project that wa…

  7. comment
  8. comment
    Comment #49171307

    I agree with you in principle, but from a practical perspective if you make piracy that trivial you'll get a lot more pirates, maybe even accidental pirates. I think as a compromis…

  9. comment
    Comment #49125450

    Yes, and as I said that's a problem with the laws, which "put the onus on Google to verify the user's age". If it were legal for the device itself to somehow determine the user's a…

  10. comment
    Comment #49110057

    You're seriously proposing letting governments decide which of their citizens are allowed unrestricted access to the internet? Of all the 3rd parties who could be responsible for t…

  11. comment
    Comment #49109894

    Well, the API itself seems fairly well designed from a privacy perspective. It only shares age ranges, not specific ages, and only if you allow it. The data is also fuzzed to preve…

  12. comment
    Comment #49084666

    This is the same mentality that drives companies to sue cybersecurity researchers for exposing vulnerabilities in their software instead of fixing the software, or to insist on kee…

  13. comment
    Comment #49075731

    If you can convince a jury with that story then it might work. Personally I wouldn't buy it. Would you?

  14. comment
    Comment #49070736

    The government can throw people in jail too but if you kidnap someone and lock them in your basement that's a crime. This is no different.

  15. comment
    Comment #49069522

    Yeah and to be more precise the problem isn't really that individuals don't get tax incentives for buying their own plan, it's that employers don't get tax incentives for giving in…

  16. comment
    Comment #49023020

    Yes. Employers get huge tax incentives for providing insurance, while individuals don't. This ensures that the only economical way to buy health insurance is through an employer, w…

  17. comment
    Comment #49022932

    Yes, the title gave me whiplash because I went in expecting an argument for socialized healthcare, then read a couple paragraphs and realized the article was actually presenting an…

  18. comment
    Comment #49021337

    The passkey design does take this into account, it's only the implementations that don't.

  19. comment
    Comment #49021299

    Because as I just outlined, passwords, even when stored in a password manager, can be misused. (Phished, set to something weak/guessable, reused on multiple sites, leaked in a data…

  20. comment
    Comment #49014043

    "A better version of password syncing" is exactly what Passkeys are and ought to be. Just like passwords, but unphishable, unguessable, not reusable across sites, not vulnerable to…

  21. comment
    Comment #49010273

    > That's just wrong. I use android, my partner uses ios. If he creates the passkey in safari, it's not going to get synced over to my phone It would, if the people implementing it …

  22. comment
    Comment #49007790

    Compared to multiple competing privately run systems, which you can opt out of even if you're in the minority ? Yes.

  23. comment
    Comment #48979352

    Yeah this is basically my take as well. The problem with not having eminent domain is that without it, for any project of sufficient size you'll end up with ~100+ land owners who e…

  24. comment
    Comment #48912214

    Devs can pretty easily implement this on their site using the BeforeInstallPromptEvent.prompt method. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Progressive_web... Though of cour…

  25. comment
    Comment #48912186

    It's not that hard to install. The website can just have a button you click to trigger an install prompt: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Progressive_web... But of cou…