Viewing profile — Aaronontheweb
Aaronontheweb
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Nov 17, 2007, 6:08 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,071
- Public activity
- 589 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Aaronontheweb
Recent public activity
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #46562178
Moving away from RSS was a mistake
- story
-
comment
Comment #46117276
> Do you have non-ACA insurance? One explanation for why your costs are so much higher than the national average is that you're on a non-complying plan (you can also still buy plan…
-
comment
Comment #46117046
I can assure you they are, if anything, understated - as I am not including the expenses my health insurance will not cover. So no, you are fully in the wrong there. What do I have…
-
comment
Comment #46116925
That's not what the link the OP included said and not what I said either, but I concede your point - that's my fault for checking individual health care marketplaces (like eHealthI…
-
comment
Comment #46116282
Dude, you don't even have your own facts straight and you are embarrassing yourself. It's clear you have no experience, don't understand your own sources you provided, or any clue …
-
comment
Comment #46116181
> ACA plans absolutely cover childbirth ( https://www.healthcare.gov/what-if-im-pregnant-or-plan-to-ge ...) that link doesn't even say what you says it does - it said you can apply…
-
comment
Comment #46116131
> the $14300 is the family out of pocket max You know they charge you, separately, for both the mother's care AND the infant's during a delivery right? Those count as two people. I…
-
comment
Comment #46116116
1. I mentioned, in multiple places, that this is the cheapest PPO offered to me through a limited selection of potential brokers / marketplaces - and that's important because it co…
-
comment
Comment #46116069
The explanation of benefits simply doesn't cover child birth - this is extremely common for individual marketplace plans.
-
comment
Comment #46115501
> Given he has 3 children, 400% of FPL in 2026 is $150,600 so he's easily eligible for ACA subsidies I am absolutely not eligible. I earn more than $150k. And "manipulating your in…
-
comment
Comment #46115444
I included screenshots of my actual health insurance premium terms, including the plan number, which is what is at issue in the article.
-
comment
Comment #46115419
Did you try reading the lengthy section of the article where I answered your question?
-
comment
Comment #46114793
> It sounds like you're trying to communicate that you pay at least $200/month per smartphone for your family? Or you don't value precision in communication. You're moving the goal…
-
comment
Comment #46114539
I pay that at least much for my family, hence why I used it
-
comment
Comment #46114481
I'm right there with you - this is a case study in "perverse incentives." There is zero benefit to "paying into the system" to be had under the current model. Better to chance it a…
-
comment
Comment #46114446
I think the market can do a better job of optimizing than central planning ever can - the problem is we have both the costs of capitalism and socialism concurrently with the model …
-
comment
Comment #46114413
I actually thought about including this in the piece (and how car sizes become a problem once you hit 4+ kids) but decided to keep it more focused on just the healthcare costs
-
comment
Comment #46114316
My wife had to have an emergency C-section the first time around when they lost the heartbeat on our first baby, so we've stuck with planned C-sections - so yes, we are somewhat co…
-
comment
Comment #46114296
I only keep this plan because we're planning on having children, so yes, it's included in the pricing decision.