Viewing profile — AIPedant
AIPedant
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Apr 05, 2025, 11:48 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 993
- Public activity
- 261 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About AIPedant
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #45357038
This is where you are confused - in fact just plain wrong: A symbol is a discrete sign that has some sort of symbol table (explicit or not) describing the mapping of the sign to th…
-
comment
Comment #45355111
No, analog computers truly are symbolic. The simplest analog computer - the abacus - is obviously symbolic, and thus is also true for WW2 gun fire control computers, ball-and-shaft…
-
comment
Comment #45353525
Articles like this indicate we should lock down the definition of "computation" that meaningfully distinguishes computing machines from other physical phenomena - a computation is …
-
comment
Comment #45235163
I understand the broader point but it is not actually constitutionally problematic for the executive branch to assert that a suspect committed a crime - of course they believe that…
-
comment
Comment #45209211
If you look at my comment history you will see that I don't think LLMs are nearly as intelligent as rats or pigeons. Rats and pigeons have an intuitive understanding of quantity an…
-
comment
Comment #45208754
"Making predictions about the world" is a reductive and childish way to describe intelligence in humans. Did David Lynch make Mulholland Drive because he predicted it would be a go…
-
comment
Comment #45203855
Putin and Xi fantasizing about immortality via 3D-printed organs quite starkly illustrated that many adults do not understand the difference between science and science fiction.
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #45160686
Keep in mind that we also have no clue how general anesthesia works! It's not just psychiatry, many medications targeting the nervous system (e.g. muscle relaxants) have unknown me…
-
comment
Comment #45139983
It didn't come completely out of nowhere, Euler and Bernoulli had looked at trigonometric series for studying the elastic motion of a deformed beam or rod. In that case, physical i…
-
comment
Comment #45137615
On the simplest end of that spectrum, Taylor series are useful because many real-world dynamics can be approximated as a "primarily linear behavior" + "nonlinear effects." (And cas…
-
comment
Comment #45122265
Caves of Qud is quite good, though a bit less traditional in being a big open world vs a dungeon. There a few quirks and bugs but the game is very fun and creative, and it has exce…
-
comment
Comment #45116136
The point is that knowing where your hand is in space relative to the rest of your body is a distinct sense which is directly three-dimensional. This information is not inferred, i…
-
comment
Comment #45116024
No, the sensors measure a continuum of force or displacement along a line or rotational axis, 1D is correct.
-
comment
Comment #45115165
Inner ear is a great example! I mentioned in another comment that if you want to be reductive the sensors in the inner ear - the hairs themselves - are one dimensional, but the ove…
-
comment
Comment #45115073
It is simply wrong to describe touch and proprioception receptors as 2D. a) In a technical sense the actual receptors are 1D, not 2D. Perhaps some of them are two dimensional, but …
-
comment
Comment #45114630
Human perception is not 2D, touch and proprioception[1] are three-dimensional senses. And of course it really makes more sense to say human perception is 3+1-dimensional since we p…
-
comment
Comment #45109651
That's not what "coherent computational representation" means in this context. It means being able to reliably apply the rules of Othello / chess / etc to the current state of the …
-
comment
Comment #45090358
I don't think "so isolated he turned to a chatbot for validation" describes this, or why people get unhealthily attached to chatbots. 1) The man became severely mentally ill in mid…
-
comment
Comment #45077034
You can say it’s exactly 1 plus or minus some small epsilon and use the completeness of the reals to argue that we can always build a finer ruler and push the epsilon down further.…
-
comment
Comment #45070024
The real point is that it takes infinite energy to get infinite precision. Let me add that we have no clue how to do a measurement that doesn't involve a photon somewhere, which me…
-
comment
Comment #45069950
I am confused why you think the exactness of integers and rationals is unphysical. "This egg carton has 12 eggs" is a (boring) physical statement. "You can make 1/3rd of a carton o…
-
comment
Comment #45065596
I have no idea what point you're trying to make. I am aware the selection process is different. If you understand the argument now but you're just splitting hairs about whether it'…
- comment