Viewing profile — A1aM0

I did spend extra time polishing wording in my replies.

You’re right: structured assessments are old news. The thing I’m testing is not “new tests,” but a tighter system: derive the rubric from real team tasks, apply the same rubric to …

This is a very fair critique, and I agree with it. You’re right that many strong engineers can’t legally share employer code, and “has OSS time” is not a universal signal. So I’m n…

Hello HN, I’m testing an idea: generate JDs from real engineering tasks, then evaluate candidates against those tasks using code evidence. Instead of writing “5+ years X, Y, Z”, in…

You hit the nail on the head regarding Juniors—they are already in a tough spot, and I certainly don't want to build a tool that makes that worse. However, my hypothesis is that ma…

Hello HN, I'm exploring a concept to fix the disconnect between "Job Descriptions" and "Actual Work." The Problem: Companies usually hire with a specific intent (e.g., "We need som…

I love the "mental model" approach here. Most guides I've seen either get bogged down in the minute details of TLS/Handshakes immediately or are way too high-level. The interactive…

Pavlo is right to be skeptical about MCP security. The entire philosophy of MCP seems to be about maximizing context availability for the model, which stands in direct opposition t…

Love it. It’s funny how we are now building modern tools just to try and get back that simple 'Palm Pilot morning read' vibe.

The 'once a day' fetching limitation is a fascinating idea. It really captures the vibe of reading a physical newspaper in the morning rather than constantly checking for updates. …