Viewing profile — 9h1d9j809s
9h1d9j809s
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Jun 30, 2013, 1:11 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 81
- Public activity
- 22 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About 9h1d9j809s
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #6122800
Not anymore. It used to work like that, which is why things like XHTML 2.0 never got traction.
-
comment
Comment #6088402
> Welcome to most jobs, ever, in every historical period and culture, ever since humans have had jobs distinct from whatever else they did with their lives. Many jobs were probably…
-
comment
Comment #6079427
"[...] it is just one of the many provocative ideas that he develops and then drops in the course of the book, which reads less like a structured argument than a long prose poem. S…
-
comment
Comment #6040179
Why? Because DNSSEC can be attacked by the DNS root? It seemed to be our best attempt to get SSL for every website. CA-based certificates just won't cut it.
-
comment
Comment #6032785
This is fine, since you have the option to decide. For most people it's okay to store the key on Apples servers. You are still protected if your computer is lost/stolen, for exampl…
-
comment
Comment #6031902
If quantum computing shows up, AES-256 will remain secure. Otherwise there is no advantage at all.
-
comment
Comment #6024818
I don't get it. Why does it matter if your tool just decrypts SSL or you use a tool that decrypts SSL and additionally unpacks the binary representation of HTTP 2.0? The output is …
-
comment
Comment #6024695
> That mainly benefits the big web monopolists, who require the browser to be the ultimate application platform, where they can track to their hearts content, display unsolicited a…
-
comment
Comment #6012990
> I think it's pretty ludicrous that so many people are willing to let an advertising company basically re-write the way that every computer on the web First, to call Google an adv…
-
comment
Comment #6006881
Yes, it is. If you make my life hell, at least give me the freedom to die.
-
comment
Comment #5999373
There is no private communication during a war. This is normal and it makes sense. We are not in a war, no matter what some say. (The article actually implies this, but I wanted to…
-
comment
Comment #5999364
Mexico is not part of South America. I agree about Chile. Uruguay is small, corrupt and almost controlled by the US. I strongly disagree about Argentina and Brazil backing America.…
-
comment
Comment #5999351
Which, by the way, would be incredibly important to stabilize the EU.
-
comment
Comment #5999288
I've lived in Bolivia for a year when Evo Morales was already president. I've also been to Venezuela. Assuming the CIA won't try to actually abduct him there and Morales will stay …
-
comment
Comment #5999276
That will not happen. Whatever the US does, it will only bring the countries of South America even closer together.
-
comment
Comment #5994631
It's a gamble no matter what he does. Of all Western countries, this is probably the best choice he can make.
-
comment
Comment #5994619
Very funny. That was in 1414 in the Holy Roman Empire (of the German Nation). How is this related to the Federal Republic of Germany in 2013?
-
comment
Comment #5983556
OS X 10.9 does show battery use per app in the Activity Monitor. It also shows a short list of battery-draining apps right in the battery menu at the top of the screen.
-
comment
Comment #5983541
I have noticed this as well. And it's not just Dropbox. I have turned off Dropbox, Google Drive and Little Snitch.
-
comment
Comment #5970782
Not true. Just image: If he had closed Guantanamo, killed less supposed terrorists using drones, ensured Manning was not tortured. - I expect most of us (people overseas) would be …
-
comment
Comment #5970732
Can you please elaborate on Reagan? How was he misunderstood?
-
comment
Comment #5965651
I think Germany is fairly autonomous. However the conservative parties are basically US fanboys.