Viewing profile — 32163704
32163704
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jul 20, 2022, 1:14 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 63
- Public activity
- 17 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About 32163704
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- comment
-
comment
Comment #32196308
Sure. When prior decisions are “unworkable or are badly reasoned,” then the Supreme Court may not follow precedent, and this is “particularly true in constitutional cases.” [0] But…
-
comment
Comment #32195732
> Now decades of an activist judiciary have distorted that concept as the legislative branch has chosen to abdicate their responsibility for their own gain, but the fact still stan…
-
comment
Comment #32195013
People in the US are free to not get raped, too, but unfortunately there are circumstances where that freedom is severely abridged.
-
comment
Comment #32194990
> that frees the other side to ignore the rules on issues they deem sufficiently important to them, and it goes quickly downhill from there. We’re already there. That’s already hap…
-
comment
Comment #32194846
Agreed. If it does stand, it will be in order to maintain ideological consistency, not judicial consistency. What a mess.
-
comment
Comment #32193098
I believe the process you’re talking about is called incorporation: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incorporation_of_the_Bill_of... The Court will rely on this precedent where conv…
-
comment
Comment #32192667
>and lower courts can and do refuse to enforce laws on that basis Courts don't enforce laws, but I get what you mean. I have no confidence whatsoever that appellate courts will do …
-
comment
Comment #32192617
>I am assuming the Supreme Court will defer to whatever the appellate court decided because it is so open and shut. Out of curiosity, what about the current makeup of appellate cou…
-
comment
Comment #32192578
Bills in general aren't laws, they are proposals for laws. [0] [0] https://www.govinfo.gov/help/bills
-
comment
Comment #32192536
The first amendment doesn't have anything to say about the Internet, so it doesn't apply. Think I'm joking? This is the stated judicial philosophy of the majority of Supreme Court …
-
comment
Comment #32192494
>How is this allowed in light of the interstate commerce clause? Laws are allowed until the Court rules on them. The states can pass all manner of fucked up laws (and they will), a…
-
comment
Comment #32192473
>The reversal or Roe was not about "kicking it back to the states", it was the first step in trying to make abortion access illegal nationwide. Yes, and it makes me angry that so m…
-
comment
Comment #32186545
Yep. That's why my therapist said, “sometimes people are depressed because their life just sucks, so let’s see if that’s the case before we consider a chemical intervention.” Notic…
-
comment
Comment #32179082
> Poverty, insecure work, sexism, racism, interpersonal conflict, etc all clearly associate with depression. The vast sums of money spent on looking for the chemical equation of lo…
-
comment
Comment #32175045
Copyright should be limited to 20 years full stop. Nobody deserves to keep making money off of something for longer than two decades.
-
comment
Comment #32165350
I presume so. Does the EU ruling require companies to offer warranties for damage caused by users installing malicious software?