Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — 32163704

32163704

HN member
Joined
Wed, Jul 20, 2022, 1:14 PM UTC
HN karma
63
Public activity
17 items

About 32163704

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
  2. comment
    Comment #32196308

    Sure. When prior decisions are “unworkable or are badly reasoned,” then the Supreme Court may not follow precedent, and this is “particularly true in constitutional cases.” [0] But…

  3. comment
    Comment #32195732

    > Now decades of an activist judiciary have distorted that concept as the legislative branch has chosen to abdicate their responsibility for their own gain, but the fact still stan…

  4. comment
    Comment #32195013

    People in the US are free to not get raped, too, but unfortunately there are circumstances where that freedom is severely abridged.

  5. comment
    Comment #32194990

    > that frees the other side to ignore the rules on issues they deem sufficiently important to them, and it goes quickly downhill from there. We’re already there. That’s already hap…

  6. comment
    Comment #32194846

    Agreed. If it does stand, it will be in order to maintain ideological consistency, not judicial consistency. What a mess.

  7. comment
    Comment #32193098

    I believe the process you’re talking about is called incorporation: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incorporation_of_the_Bill_of... The Court will rely on this precedent where conv…

  8. comment
    Comment #32192667

    >and lower courts can and do refuse to enforce laws on that basis Courts don't enforce laws, but I get what you mean. I have no confidence whatsoever that appellate courts will do …

  9. comment
    Comment #32192617

    >I am assuming the Supreme Court will defer to whatever the appellate court decided because it is so open and shut. Out of curiosity, what about the current makeup of appellate cou…

  10. comment
    Comment #32192578

    Bills in general aren't laws, they are proposals for laws. [0] [0] https://www.govinfo.gov/help/bills

  11. comment
    Comment #32192536

    The first amendment doesn't have anything to say about the Internet, so it doesn't apply. Think I'm joking? This is the stated judicial philosophy of the majority of Supreme Court …

  12. comment
    Comment #32192494

    >How is this allowed in light of the interstate commerce clause? Laws are allowed until the Court rules on them. The states can pass all manner of fucked up laws (and they will), a…

  13. comment
    Comment #32192473

    >The reversal or Roe was not about "kicking it back to the states", it was the first step in trying to make abortion access illegal nationwide. Yes, and it makes me angry that so m…

  14. comment
    Comment #32186545

    Yep. That's why my therapist said, “sometimes people are depressed because their life just sucks, so let’s see if that’s the case before we consider a chemical intervention.” Notic…

  15. comment
    Comment #32179082

    > Poverty, insecure work, sexism, racism, interpersonal conflict, etc all clearly associate with depression. The vast sums of money spent on looking for the chemical equation of lo…

  16. comment
    Comment #32175045

    Copyright should be limited to 20 years full stop. Nobody deserves to keep making money off of something for longer than two decades.

  17. comment
    Comment #32165350

    I presume so. Does the EU ruling require companies to offer warranties for damage caused by users installing malicious software?