Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — 22289d

22289d

HN member
Joined
Sat, Nov 26, 2022, 12:44 AM UTC
HN karma
249
Public activity
124 items

About 22289d

hn@22289d.com

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #38542507

    > I'm not sure a single "framework" would work for everyone. I guess you weren't lying because that is not what a web framework is. If it works for just me, that's a web framework.…

  2. comment
    Comment #37813349

    If you see the alternatives as moderate the thread or ignore it all, I agree with you. But for me the alternatives are moderate the thread or allow them to drag me into a hundred d…

  3. comment
    Comment #37813220

    I do not agree with your characterization of what's occurring here. See the person above us: >You're a fool if you think that the way reddit handles content moderation does not cre…

  4. comment
    Comment #37813144

    Someone argued they maximize outraged. I argued that they do not. I don't think it's pedantic at all to say the goalposts are whether or not they maximize outrage. I totally unders…

  5. comment
    Comment #37809966

    That was the final straw, yes. And if they were seeking to maximize outrage, they wouldn't have done that.

  6. comment
    Comment #37809924

    > I don't know about reddit enough and just struggling to even guess the context here. Reddit is extremely massive. With uber millions of people on it. And anyone can make a subred…

  7. comment
    Comment #37809896

    As per my original comment: >Is either platform successful in their attempts? Arguably, no. But that wasn't my point, I was addressing the claim that they seek to maximize outrage.…

  8. comment
    Comment #37809860

    I was responding to someone else who said it. They did say '...whose business model depends on...outrage'. So ya, that interpretation is the logical one. If your business model dep…

  9. comment
    Comment #37809760

    > No, what I'm saying is they maximize outrage, but pretend that they care about civility. Then you're wrong. They don't just pretend to care, they take actions. I've already given…

  10. comment
    Comment #37809603

    i said they do not seek to maximize outrage. please keep the goalposts right there and address only that one specific argument. as it's the only argument i'm making.

  11. comment
    Comment #37809586

    I addressed a very specific claim someone made - that they seek to maximize outrage. And that is all I addressed. I am not interested in broadening the scope and defending everythi…

  12. comment
    Comment #37809572

    Here are the goalposts: 'seek to maximize outrage' Please do not add any extra words to that, thus shifting the goalposts. Here you have added the word 'profit'. I never said anyth…

  13. comment
    Comment #37809556

    I'm unsure if you're making some kind of argument or just adding a footnote. If that's an argument, it doesn't change anything about what I said.

  14. comment
    Comment #37809547

    So what you're saying is deep down they wish they could maximize outrage but they don't because they want to appease advertisers and regulators. We're not disagreeing. I wasn't spe…

  15. comment
    Comment #37809512

    You're supporting my argument. You're saying it's not in their best interests to maximize outrage. That's where the goalposts are and that's where they are going to stay: whether o…

  16. comment
    Comment #37809464

    A good example of what? A platform not seeking to maximize outrage? Yes. They banned the Donald Trump subreddit. That one subreddit produced more outrage than probably everything e…

  17. comment
    Comment #37809377

    Edit: thought of a better example - Donald Trump getting banned from most social media. If they were seeking to maximize outrage, they wouldn't do that. They'd assign an employee t…

  18. comment
    Comment #37711774

    > That is a very disingenuous way to describe signups. I wasn't describing signups, I was specifically describing the Quora signup. People have been bitching about that for almost …

  19. comment
    Comment #37709626

    a) that isn't what's keeping them. people don't stay somewhere because things that bother you, don't bother them. you didn't name anything they like about it. b) the mandatory sign…

  20. comment
    Comment #37709565

    That's my impression of Quora today too. It was such a special place in the early years. Sad to see what they let happen to it. The saddest part is that it's surely deliberate. The…

  21. comment
    Comment #37708080

    I think you just set the World Record for most strawmen in one comment. Congratulations. If you took what I said to be some type of blanket 'Reddit is a perfect and wonderful place…

  22. story
  23. comment
    Comment #37706364

    Man, HN has sure changed. Clearly I'm not among fellow hackers if people are worried about tone rather than truth. If someone needs their ass kissed to recognize I'm right, that's …

  24. comment
    Comment #37706082

    > There is no "Reddit culture"; on Reddit, culture is scoped to a subreddit. There is both. For example, anonymity. There is nothing stopping people from using their real name as t…

  25. comment
    Comment #37705988

    > These subreddit can be as varied in response as humans can I've never been anywhere on Reddit that doesn't have the specific characteristic that I'm referring to. If people think…