Viewing profile — 19guid
19guid
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Dec 02, 2016, 2:41 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 127
- Public activity
- 30 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About 19guid
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #15755191
> Can't have that if there is no competitive ISP you can change to, if you don't like this NN violating ISP. Sure, but that indicates a need for competition, not net neutrality. As…
-
comment
Comment #15755089
1. Even if it prevents some of the worst abuses by incumbents, net neutrality regulation isn't going to create more competition. In fact, if net neutrality regulation creates addit…
-
comment
Comment #15755035
I think it makes sense because retail ISPs operate in a two-sided market. Comcast provides access to Internet services, which customers want and are willing to pay for. Similarly, …
-
comment
Comment #15754890
I've posted this comment before in another thread: I oppose net neutrality regulation. In principle, I don't think there's anything wrong with an ISP prioritizing certain kinds of …
-
comment
Comment #15331592
Per CDC (2014), the marriage rate in the United States is 6.9/1000 people while the divorce rate is 3.2/1000 people. [1] I'd say that's very high. 1: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fasta…
-
comment
Comment #15234765
The answer is probably no. Requiring a person to unlock a device is not prohibited by the Fifth Amendment simply because the device contains incriminating information that would ot…
-
comment
Comment #14962251
I think it's more likely that there's a history here that we're not aware of. His complaint suggests he's been arguing with Google's management for some time, and that this memo wa…
-
comment
Comment #14925747
That's why the parent said "legally in the US", not "at the border".
-
comment
Comment #14924446
Or even: \ls
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #14660265
Huh? Section 33 hasn't just been used once. Quebec used to invoke section 33 on every piece of legislation passed by the National Assembly.
-
comment
Comment #14511137
I oppose net neutrality regulation. In principle, I don't think there's anything wrong with an ISP prioritizing certain kinds of traffic over others, so long as it does not have an…
-
comment
Comment #14510944
I agree that bandwidth is not scarce in the same way as other goods. However, the fact remains that network infrastructure is expensive and it makes sense to pass more of the costs…
-
comment
Comment #13538579
Alternatively, why doesn't the gay couple just go somewhere else? I would imagine that only a very small minority of bakers/photographers/florists have strong feelings on this issu…
-
comment
Comment #13538565
This is true. The case is stronger if the baker designs a custom cake or has to write a message on the cake, or if the florist designs a custom floral arrangement.
-
comment
Comment #13538560
The cases I listed above all involve sole proprietorships or closely-held companies, so compelling the business to engage in protected speech is tantamount to compelling the indivi…
-
comment
Comment #13538543
The two aren't mutually exclusive. I imagine you would agree that a journalist still engages in protected speech when he writes articles in exchange for compensation. Why isn't a p…
-
comment
Comment #13536066
Serving drinks is not protected speech; taking a photograph is.
-
comment
Comment #13535625
In the context of expressive services like wedding photography, yes. The government should not be allowed to compel protected speech, even when such compulsion would be in the publ…
-
comment
Comment #13535590
I don't think refusal of service is itself protected speech either, but we're not talking about the government restricting protected speech. We're talking about the government comp…