Viewing profile — 15characterslon
15characterslon
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Apr 08, 2018, 10:20 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 75
- Public activity
- 32 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About 15characterslon
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #30807436
It worked perfectly well. It still works. Companies can transfer the data and no one gets sued. Legal enough.
-
comment
Comment #30798861
It doesn't support syncing properly, if you use it on desktop + Android + iOS you have to trust three different app vendors, browser integration isn't nearly as good as 1Password, …
-
comment
Comment #30798837
Bitwarden is subscription-based too. Or are you on the free tier with almost no features?
-
comment
Comment #30714703
They had massive problems with their main database cluster (MySQL). If you read through their engineering blog, most of the outages were related to their growth and the main databa…
-
comment
Comment #30568292
Best not turn it on again at all. Just to be sure ;)
-
comment
Comment #30445661
Maybe you could use family sharing. https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/7507744?hl=en
-
comment
Comment #30397176
It's funny you say that because kids today don't really have files either, since all the content is confined in apps.
-
comment
Comment #30232043
And that's why we shouldn't fix bugs anymore? https://xkcd.com/1172/ Fixing this would only affect users who send emails "from" other users email addresses, basically users who com…
-
comment
Comment #30231966
That's not true. SPF and DKIM were explicitly made to prevent email forging by authenticating the server, and the server is responsible for authenticating the user. Please name eve…
-
comment
Comment #30230304
No, they don't do that check, that is the problem.
-
comment
Comment #30230266
As others said, DKIM always includes "from". And almost none of the emails I get are S/MIME or PGP signed. Like you said: SPF and DMARC only authenticate the server. It's up to the…
-
comment
Comment #30230215
AFAIK they still refuse to acknowledge the problem. But since they deleted the forum thread, how would I know. What they said in the forum doesn't make much sense. Yes, anyone in t…
-
comment
Comment #30224906
Be aware that Mailbox.org allows any user to send emails as ("from") any other user via SMTP and these emails will look legit since they pass SPF and DKIM checks. Many consider thi…
-
comment
Comment #30174924
But what alternatives are there? I just need a solution for the usual stuff: mail, contacts, calendar, notes, tasks, files and meetings. Microsoft? Haha, hell no (they never did fr…
-
comment
Comment #30071905
Gotta know exactly what is behind those mosaic pixels.
-
comment
Comment #30041627
How much does it cost to run this on Azure?
-
comment
Comment #29980428
According to statista, the UK has about 14 million residents younger than 20 years, so they're just counting everyone as a potential victim. https://www.statista.com/statistics/281…
-
comment
Comment #29772528
Maybe deliver high quality results for adblock users only. Lower server costs for adblock users while maximizing ad-revenue for users without adblock. Win-win.
-
comment
Comment #29724069
You can set your own passphrase in sync settings. This will enable end-to-end encryption and Google won't be able to read your synced data (not just passwords but also history and …
-
comment
Comment #29719075
I didn't mean to insult you. I think it's great if you're experimenting and I fully support that. It's just that the headline set high expectations and the article reads like this …
-
comment
Comment #29692733
> It was easier than I thought to create a mail server that works as well as Gmail’s No it isn't and no you didn't. The article doesn't even cover basic stuff like email rules and …
-
comment
Comment #28903663
The README could be improved here. I didn't know about Nitter, Invidious, ... It wasn't clear to me that these are just different frontends for the same services when I read the RE…
-
comment
Comment #20359940
That would be my point too. DNS-based content blocking is very ineffective and can be outsmarted very easily. DNS filters might be very easy to set up but if they become more major…
-
comment
Comment #20359882
Most major public (non-ISP) DNS resolvers support DNS-over-TLS today. (This includes Google, Cloudflare and Quad9.) The problem for the ISP is that switching to those resolvers wou…
-
comment
Comment #20058321
Depends on whether you consider a 7 months old feature new or not. https://www.ghacks.net/2018/10/01/chrome-70-features-option-...