Viewing profile — 11101010010001
11101010010001
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Feb 03, 2026, 9:04 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 22
- Public activity
- 25 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About 11101010010001
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49252552
add time to the dimension and we'll find out what we already knew ... momentum kills.
-
comment
Comment #49105408
publications would likely lead to regulation, if the SEC was properly resourced.
-
comment
Comment #48694067
read Ron Maimon.
-
comment
Comment #48673668
Both your statement and the OPs are an appeal to expertise which is not a substitute for the scientific method.
-
comment
Comment #48653605
Very much this. Very funny to see we're back to hardware is still hard.
-
comment
Comment #48542247
All these analogies are just bad. If we are going to live with LLMs, let's reason from first principles. 'It feels like we're just going to be left with analogies'.
-
comment
Comment #48415132
The problem is we keep learning that learning doesn't scale and there is nothing we can do about.
-
comment
Comment #48403959
What is the current scientific proof for Game Boy Advance at age 6?
-
comment
Comment #48403749
There isn't a giant leap between the workers and the users. Stop using meta products period.
-
comment
Comment #48358210
Hold on. This is just geometry. Unless the number of top slots is growing, the cap will be fixed.
-
comment
Comment #48311364
>“All my clients already feel like they pay too much,” Pollack said. “These numbers are significant. I don’t care how wealthy you are.” If that argument holds up in court, we are a…
-
comment
Comment #48303423
SEs would rather play many player versions of the prisoner's dilemma than unionize.
-
comment
Comment #48303386
just don't call it organized labor.
-
comment
Comment #48225711
That's a model.
-
comment
Comment #48050311
Your grandparents probably worked their asses off too.
-
comment
Comment #47808399
to be clear, marketers are not the only ones to blame for useless sites.
-
comment
Comment #47799181
The future is uncertain, always has been. Is the future more uncertain than in the past?
-
comment
Comment #47433952
take my pound of flesh.
-
comment
Comment #47364853
So reasoning from first principles is equivalent to doing it for the money?
-
comment
Comment #47330793
One could argue that a way of proving Fukuyama wrong would require a 'new ideology' leading to global nuclear disarmament.
-
comment
Comment #47166944
What is the 'INSERTNAME' law that explains how all conversations on HN, which is ostensibly focused on tech, devolve (evolve) into the realm of the humanities?
-
comment
Comment #47053567
Any solution that isn't based on first principles will make the problem worst. And even then, the first principles might show that you can't fix it. But at least you will know.
-
comment
Comment #47051121
You answered your own question. People are 'too scared' to share their thoughts so they share AIs instead. I suspect if you scared people about the use of AI, there may be an incre…
-
comment
Comment #46966641
All it takes is a demographic trend to make the entire population a bunch of crackpots! Behold.
-
comment
Comment #46877292
Yes publishing is broken, but academics are the last people to jump onto platforms...they never left email. If you want to change the publishing game, turn publishing into email.