Viewing profile — 1010100101
1010100101
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Nov 29, 2011, 12:15 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 75
- Public activity
- 50 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About 1010100101
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #3301180
I'll throw in my .02. I see the context-switch as one between text and graphics. If I'm working on the command line, then most times I have no need to have X11 running. I'm working…
-
comment
Comment #3301114
Because it is tied to the checking system, where checks were routinely flown across the country from bank to bank before they could be settled? (Even after we had electronic system…
-
comment
Comment #3300865
I'm curious, have you used Plan9? If yes, how long did you use it?
-
comment
Comment #3300751
Email is store and forward, not real-time. And all the mainstream messaging services to date have been centralised, at least in the sense that they involve interacting with a third…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #3300580
One of my favourite quotes. History is so easily ignored or forgotten.
-
comment
Comment #3300557
proper grammar: Are we next?
-
comment
Comment #3298711
I imagine there might be other software/consulting companies in the business of stealthily collecting GB and PB's of personal data about consumers using wired and mobile networks w…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #3298281
ramchip, you are correct. With respect to "telling something to some of your friends", and attempting to do so "privately", there are certainly ways to do this without using Facebo…
-
comment
Comment #3298218
You said: "I think it has to be a part of a large _service_." My question was about the size of the _network_. In any event, following your line of thought, do you think it's possi…
-
comment
Comment #3297552
You said: "I don't think any large..." If someone only wants to tell something to some of their friends, and assuming "some" is not a large number, does the network have to be "lar…
-
comment
Comment #3297493
"Then don't tell them through Facebook." And that's the point. If a current offering such as Facebook is "not a solution that people like", then that creates an opportunity for a s…
-
comment
Comment #3297305
What if someone wants to tell a few friends about something but doesn't want to tell all the people working at Facebook, all its clients and potentially any other Facebook user?
-
comment
Comment #3297212
As another commenter pointed out, Zuckerberg once called users "dumb fucks" for giving him their personal information. If he does not believe in privacy, as he now claims, why woul…
-
comment
Comment #3297158
"inherently public" Exactly. The ideas of a "Facebook" _as Zuckerberg has constructed it_, i.e. a website on the open internet, and "privacy" are incompatible.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #3297022
"Privacy is a matter of social responsibility." Privacy is a matter of not using Facebook.
-
comment
Comment #3296958
So where does the investor obtain the information to perform due diligence? Are companies required to file reports? If so, with whom do they file them?
-
comment
Comment #3296728
Interesting. So you think that with no SEC the public will be safer from people like Madoff? Do you think that investors would be able to make sound investment decisions without co…
-
comment
Comment #3296529
Is it unreasonable for a consumer to want complete control over a device from the moment she powers on? Is there a certain level beneath which it is not reasonable to give consumer…
-
comment
Comment #3296434
Yikes. The SEC certainly has its flaws, but if SEC regulations are stopping anyone from becoming more wealthy it's certainly not the small guy.
-
comment
Comment #3296295
I do not want a "smartphone". I want a "blank slate". With the right specs and form factor.
-
comment
Comment #3296159
There is no sense of humour on HN.
-
comment
Comment #3294666
This company just seems so over the top, it's surreal. There's probably plenty more like them that us plebes don't know about. What would we do without EFF?