Viewing profile — 0x62c1b43e
0x62c1b43e
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Jan 27, 2018, 7:34 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 42
- Public activity
- 22 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About 0x62c1b43e
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #34963679
What’s even worse is crypto meaning cryptocurrency instead of cryptography now. Now I can’t talk about “crypto” without sounding like I’m going to fill up someone’s spam folder.
-
comment
Comment #34963295
I saw metrics like this a while ago but it’s still hard to wrap my head around. We rarely see this enormous portion of the animals that outnumber us so much. I grew up on a farm in…
-
comment
Comment #34963220
If I were going to do this, I’d probably go all the way to using ReScript, but it’s a nice idea. I’m quite surprised it’s not called ToffeeScript though.
-
comment
Comment #34963200
The compilation speed of ReScript is also great
-
comment
Comment #34676998
C on its own does feel like a simpler language though I think it’s true that the semantics taken literally undermine it (the generated assembly can be really surprising sometimes).…
-
comment
Comment #34650260
> The container/heap is more useful, but it could benefit more from adding an optimization for inlining interface method calls when Go compiler knows the underlying implementation …
-
comment
Comment #34646126
It’s not the only one. Some other packages that used workarounds like interface{} or other things to work around the lack of generics were container/{heap,list,ring}, sort, golang.…
-
comment
Comment #34645997
Those are good points about some of them being nontrivial. Though part of why they’re optimized and in the stdlib in the first place is because they’re such common patterns. So wit…
-
comment
Comment #34632071
By that logic we should remove bytes.Clone, strings.Split, bytes.Equal, strings.TrimLeftFunc, etc. from the standard library.
-
comment
Comment #34629998
*lately It pops up on /r/golang sometimes. I don’t think it gets taken super seriously but there’s usually at least someone bringing it up.
-
comment
Comment #34627408
Yeah, and I don’t tend to keep this around quantitatively, but I’ve certainly run into bugs in Go programs that would’ve been categorically prevented with generics. Of course I wan…
-
comment
Comment #34627369
Generics consistently showed up as one of the most desired features (if not the most desired) by working Go developers in the previous developer surveys, so I think it makes sense …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #34622519
It’s hard to be objective because of filter bubbles, but I’ve seen it a lot on Reddit last.
-
comment
Comment #34621097
I understand, but it shows that compiler performance is the same as before generics now, so any performance hit is gone.
-
comment
Comment #34620611
I’m gonna be that guy, but do you have sources for any of this? That link shows that compiler performance is the same as before generics, for instance. Are there more bugs in the c…
-
comment
Comment #34620595
But if adoption is “very low”, then it’s not much pollution, is it?
-
comment
Comment #22399295
A lot of people use PlusCal, which is basically pseudocode that compiles to TLA+. Depending on what you're modeling, PlusCal or directly writing TLA+ might be a better fit.
-
comment
Comment #19125817
Reminds me of https://programmingisterrible.com/post/139222674273/write-co...
-
comment
Comment #17735389
They have a section discussing why this paper might seem to contradict other studies showing a causal link: > This outcome seems at odds with findings from randomized controlled tr…
-
comment
Comment #17726963
https://examine.com/supplements/ashwagandha/?PageSpeed=noscr... If you haven't encountered it, examine.com is a good resource; they curate research on supplements. In the Human Eff…
-
comment
Comment #16247698
Could you share what preprocessors/templating languages you've used with CloudFormation?