Viewing profile — 0x434D53
0x434D53
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Sep 06, 2014, 10:32 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 14
- Public activity
- 11 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About 0x434D53
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #11684778
That happens, when a content marketer write about a technical topic... Just sad.
-
comment
Comment #11387079
Which also teaches horrible security practices. Pleas also use gorilla/csrf and not your own brown "solution".
-
comment
Comment #11098944
So what's the conclusion of this besides some useless numbers?
-
comment
Comment #10493188
Well, in the case of Lazer he did not fail completely. I wonder if the Dr. ever heard of Gamergate.
-
comment
Comment #10492413
Wow, trying to doxx people is just the lowest.
-
comment
Comment #10407230
You are not forced to handle errors. Or do you check for the errors returned by fmt.Print? I guess not. This was my point: In many areas go forces the developer to the right thing …
-
comment
Comment #10403141
Go is one of my working languages. Like with every other language (Python, OCAML, C#, some Java, Swift) i have a love-hate relationship with go. What i agree on: What i agree on wi…
-
comment
Comment #9099903
For an array (which are value types in go) you have the obvious element-wise equality. For slices? Also element-wise? Even with different capacities? If the refer to the same windo…
-
comment
Comment #9099637
A slice is not an array of bytes. That's exactly the point. See http://blog.golang.org/go-slices-usage-and-internals to get a basic understanding
-
comment
Comment #8305321
I don't get that outcry and panic inside the Scala community. We should give the 2 forks a chance and see what it leads to. There is still the chance then to reunite the community …
-
comment
Comment #8279708
It's the users fault! App.net was a alternative to twitter, but a paid one. Failed. So users are in no position that they are the product sold to advertisers. They actively decided…