Viewing profile — 0bfusct3
0bfusct3
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Jun 06, 2010, 10:55 AM UTC
- HN karma
- -8
- Public activity
- 22 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About 0bfusct3
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #1560502
Professional Linux Kernel Architecture has a good introduction into the Linux/os nomenclature.
-
comment
Comment #1540761
People that have all this "talent" is nothing more than a drive for something - the talent in x, y, z is a side effect. My drive is for a distributed, vm based operating system and…
-
comment
Comment #1540480
Tivo releases what they see as either not a competitive advantage or a burden to maintain. Just like Nvidia releases the shim but nothing relating the how the hardware works - it's…
-
comment
Comment #1540476
My example may have been flawed (it was meant for exaggeration ) but the point still remains that API use is fine under GPL v2.
-
comment
Comment #1540260
Then taking it all the way down to the hardware, every user of x86 should be required to agree to a license agreement to use an x86 processor since it 'interprets' opcodes on-the-f…
-
comment
Comment #1529474
Overhead of the operating system and more likely a massive amount of packets per second will easily peg a single core.. I did some tests with nginx (comparable to node.js) and it e…
-
comment
Comment #1528446
Maybe it's just me but I think this is incredibly stupid - He's abstracting the issue that Unix isn't distributed into a single application. It's like putting $5000 rims and muffle…
-
comment
Comment #1528438
Configuration files need to be static key value or a relational algebra - you cannot have mutations and branches based on logic within a configuration or else you introduce issues …
-
comment
Comment #1525238
c, capabilties (or lack there of), self healing, runtime based optimizations, concurrency, locking, threading and just generally the way it's structured it's not meant to be a dist…
-
comment
Comment #1525075
Sure they do but they use extremely specialized software that probably took years to apply to the platform let alone developing the software. Linux is the top in distributed comput…
-
comment
Comment #1525066
That's like saying language y is fine because I can just search and copy and paste... no you cannot. If you do anything beyond a simple [[ -f somefile ]] && do something sh turns i…
-
comment
Comment #1525057
Simple interfaces tying into a vm for complete distribution of software on any architecture. Concurrent, functional and slightly object orientated low level languages allowing auto…
-
comment
Comment #1524927
The same can be said for *nixes, in order to create something in sh using programs you need literally days of reading man pages for switches, etc or use perl, python, etc.. but eve…
-
comment
Comment #1524912
Unix is bad, crusty and getting less relevant due to how computers are becoming more distributed and less as a single system. Linux may be the top of the herd right now but sooner …
-
comment
Comment #1524867
Get a hardware book and read up on how computers actually work. This will help an immeasurable amount to understanding why C is the way it is.
-
comment
Comment #1516457
I recently ditched rails for sinatra / padrino (mostly sinatra) due to the fact that if you want to do something off the beaten path, even in rails 3 it's a complete crap shoot of …
-
comment
Comment #1509451
Not to crap on the parade or anything but new languages are a dime a dozen and most all offer the same exact paradigms rehashed over and over and over. What I want is a low level e…
-
comment
Comment #1496468
This shows nothing more than a badly implemented api. POSIX is a bad api for anything modern (distributed).
-
comment
Comment #1496106
This 6k vs 6M LoC comparison is pretty dubious. If your disk driver has a bug and overwrites some data you're just as screwed up, be it running in userspace or kernel space. The ar…
-
comment
Comment #1462983
Linux has exploitable bugs about once a week, read lwn and scan over the security page for kernel cve's.
-
comment
Comment #1456460
The problem with opscode is that it still does take work to scale due to applications needing to be reconfigured in order to allow multiple servers (and this is the main issue with…
-
comment
Comment #1408422
Can we just call it what it's been known as in computer science since oh 1960's distributed operating systems?